Thursday, November 30, 2006

War criminals on the run

Israeli war criminals on the run.

Former Israel Defense Forces chief of staff Lieutenant General Moshe Ya'alon left New Zealand in a hurry this week, after a warrant was issued for his arrest for suspected war crimes.The New Zealand Justice Ministry issued the warrant on Tuesday, several days after a request by a New Zealand resident that was co-signed by various local and international human rights organizations.The warrant names Ya'alon for ordering an Israel Air Force attack on the home of senior Hamas official Salah Shehada in the Gaza Strip in 2002. Shahada, the founder of Hamas' military wing, and one of his aides were killed in the attack along with 13 civilians.

General Doron Almog was told by John Scarlett (through Yaki Dagan Israeli chief spy, London ) not get off the plane he was sitting in on September 10, 2005, as he arrived in London.

Almog learned that a warrant had been issued (by Chief London Magistrate Timothy Workman) for his arrest for violating the Geneva Conventions in connection with the home destructions in Gaza.Officials at the Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem said they had received confirmation from the embassy in New Zealand regarding the charges. Ya'alon was not available for comment. Wellington suspended ties with Israel in the wake of the affair, but restored relations after Jerusalem offered a formal apology

In 2002 Shaul Mofaz, now the Israeli defense minister but then recently retired as the IDF’s chief of staff, reportedly left Britain hurriedly after an attempt to have him arrested on similar charges.

Our Military Industrial Complex

Our military industrial simplex.

It goes from the like of Olver to Pole1 to Pole2 to Phoney1.

Britain's level of defence spending isn't related to real threats we face, but the needs of our military-industrial complex.

Blair was eager not to antagonise British arms companies, and BAE Systems in particular, which developed extremely close relationships with senior figures in Downing Street." A Downing Street aide reported that whenever the head of BAE encountered a problem, "he'd be straight on the phone to No 10 and it would get sorted".

We don't know what Blair's proposed new nuclear missiles are for, but after the money has been spent a justification is bound to emerge.

Some body must have some WMD somewhere, surely.

Secret payments of millions of pounds from BAE have been found in Swiss accounts.

Blair is said to be the beneficiary of some of those funds.

Details from the accounts would help to establish whether money was channelled to people close to him, sources said.

BEA wants the SFO to abandon the investigation before anything else comes to light.
Speculation over the progress of the inquiry led to a dip in the company's share price earlier this week.

But the SFO appears determined to focus on the accounts and their links to people close to Blair and Peter Mandelson.

Though he is not regarded himself as a target of the inquiry - BAE acknowledges that the inquiry is aimed at the company and Mr. Mandelson.

Both the Swiss legal authorities in Bern, and the SFO director, Robert Wardle, have been keeping their moves secret.

Swiss authorities said yesterday: "The office of the attorney general of Switzerland confirms being in charge of the execution of a request for mutual legal assistance in criminal matters from the UK serious fraud office relating to this case." They and the SFO refuse to give any further details. The MoD, which is negotiating the deal to sell Eurofighters, remained silent.

The only person with the power to halt joint SFO-MoD police inquiries is the attorney general, Lord Goldsmith who is a close friend of Blair.. But Britain is party to an OECD agreement, under which national economic interests are not allowed to stand in the way of efforts to stamp out bribery.

BAE said: "BAE Systems is not obstructing the investigation and continues to fully co-operate with the SFO." Their spokesman said: "We will not be commenting on any point of substance. This cannot be taken as any kind of admission."

Grinning terrorist

AMMAN, Jordan - President Bush said Thursday the United States will speed the "cut and run" out of Iraq.

Bush assured Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki that Washington is not looking for a "graceful exit" from the lost war as any exit will do as long as the troops don’t have to take helicopters from the roof of the embassy in the Green Zone.

Under intensifying political pressure at home, the American and Iraqi leaders came together for a hastily arranged summit to make it seem that Bush is in control of something in Iraq and to explore how to cut and run without delay.

Wednesday, November 29, 2006

Apartheid comes to israel

Apartheid comes to Israel

The proposed new Citizenship Law and the Illegal Residents Law (Amendment No. 19 to the Entry into Israel Law) are much alike. Both call for a dramatic closure of Israel's gates to non-Jews, especially residents of the Palestinian Authority. Both are illegal and go against the constitution. Both rely on non-demographic arguments but are clearly aimed largely at preserving the demographic balance.
The Group Areas Act of 1950 (Act No. 41 of 1950) was an act of parliament created under the apartheid government of South Africa that assigned races to different residential and business sections in urban areas. The effect of the law was essentially to exclude any non-White from being allowed to live in established towns or to live and work in any established economically viable areas - all of which were proclaimed to be White areas. It caused many non-Whites to have to commute large distances from their homes in order to be able to work. The law led to non-Whites being forcibly removed for living in the "wrong" areas.

Christmas card

Phoney and his wife sent this card to all the kids about the same age as Leo that they happened to slaughter in the past year.

Nice of them

Tuesday, November 28, 2006

Prepare to know less.

Prepare to know less.

Goebbels will tell you what you need to know.

As with Fox news in America…it was found that anyone who watches it…will know less than before they saw it and what they do know is wrong.

This is the same with Sky news here.

The more you watch the less you know.

That would make a good advertising slogan for BskyB.

And it is about to get worse.

Dumb Down Goebbels now publicly owns 17.9% of ITV shares.

He also secretly owns or controls another 20% through placemen buyers.

That gives him control of 40% of ITV shares which is illegal under British law.

He also controls Brown and Blair so the BBC will get little or no funding in their licence fee.

This is lovely.

A miserable little crook from Aussie can control the flow of information to the British people and also control out government.

We deported these loaf robbers centuries ago and barred them and their descendants from ever returning.

How did this little fart get back in and begin to tell us what to think?

Next thing ye know we’ll all be robbing bread like his ancestors.

Goebbels strikes fast

The BBC’s chairman, Michael Grade, has sensationally switched-over to become executive chairman of ITV at the direct invitation of Goebbels Murdoch.

Grade’s defection will stun colleagues and cause mayhem inside the BBC and with Tessa Jowell because she supported Grade before her Cabinet superiors.

The Culture secretary said she was "disappointed about his departure and had not been told about it but that when Goebbels barks everyone, including Tony, jumps."

She said "Goebbels had called Tony and told him he was taking Grade for ITV and Tony then informed her, saying nothing could be done."

Grade, who will take up his new post in the New Year, has led the BBC’s controversial demand for a new licence fee settlement of 2.3 per cent above inflation, which, it is understood, has been resisted strongly by Tony Blair and the Chancellor Gordon Brown on the orders of Goebbels.

"Sir Richard Branson can now go to hell " said Goebbels "and as for his demand that the Government invalidates BskyB’s stake in ITV…it’s just a joke."

"I own this lousy Government," he said.

Monday, November 27, 2006

Phoney apologizes for Iraq slaughter

Phoney will express his "deep sorrow" today for Britain's role in Iraq but will stop short of demands for a full apology.

The Prime Minister describes the illegal Iraq invasion, which Britain helped to organize, as a "crime against humanity" in an article for the Muslim magazine Destroyed Nation.

His decision to say sorry for the slaughter comes after a lengthy cabinet debate and is intended to coincide with the British exit from Iraq early next year.

He says: "It is hard to believe that what would now be a crime against humanity was legal three years ago.

"Personally, I believe the cut and run offers us a chance not just to say how profoundly shameful our attack was - how we condemn its existence utterly and praise those who fought for its abolition, but also to express our deep sorrow it ever happened, that it ever could have happened and to rejoice at the different and better times we live in today."

The Prime Minister's condemnation is intended to clear the air before he retires in shame and ignominy.

Cocktail sausage, the Deputy Prime Minister, has been drawing up ideas for the 25 March retirement including the possibility of a "statement of regret" over Britain's involvement
"The Prime Minister wanted to make a statement that outlines his views on the 700,000 innocent people he murdered," said a senior Whitehall official.

Sunday, November 26, 2006

Goebbels caught short

The tension between Murdoch and his oldest children over the terms of a trust holding the family's 28.5 percent stake in News Corporation, estimated in 2005 to be worth about $6.1 billion has now reached boiling point.

Under the trust, his children by Wendi Deng share in the proceeds of the stock but have no voting privileges or control of the stock. Voting rights in the stock are divided 50/50 between Murdoch on the one side and his children of his first two marriages.

Goebbels has now changed the trust and moved the shares to allow his (Murdoch's voting privileges) to pass to his children by Wendi.

It was always Murdoch's stated desire to have his children by Wendi Deng given a measure of control over the stock proportional to their financial interest in it but he has now gone the whole hog.

This may be illegal under trust laws but Goebbels has the politicians in the bag and has managed to subvert that particular law too.

All’s well that ends well.

Until Anna, Sarah and the gang get wind of this and head for the courts.

Israel to put up old Apartheid signs

The ban on allowing Palestinians to ride in Israeli cars in the West Bank will be enforced throughout the West Bank, a senior Israel Defense Forces officer told Haaretz.

The officer said that he himself would never give rides to Palestinians, and that he personally would always enforce the rule as long as he could.

The officer acknowledged that the ban, instituted by GOC Central Command Yair Naveh, does not "sound good," but insisted that it was meant primarily to be a racial statement like in apartheid in South Africa. The order was issued, he said, to separate the bloody Arabs from us proper Jewish folk.

However, the Yesh Din organization has asked Defense Minister Amir Peretz to overturn the rule, arguing that it, like several other orders approved by Naveh, creates a legal mechanism of separation on the basis of national origin in the West Bank. As a result, they said, it is clearly illegal, and "constitutes an international crime, the crime of apartheid."

The senior officer explained that the order was clearly aimed at Palestinians because they are all terrorists.

Hillary defends AIPAC

Hillary Clinton defends AIPAC.

Clinton has described as outrageous the attacks on the AIPAC by Pelosi and other Democrats in the new Congress and the refusal to give them key jobs.

Hillary said that the attempt by Pelosi to block AIPAC candidates for the top Democratic jobs in Congress was unpatriotic and un American.

Hillary went on to say that Israel was the natural and real-time ruler in Washington and anyone who did not know that would never get anywhere in American politics.

She said Bill had taught her that as her first lesson in running for the Presidency.

He had learned to his cost, and many investigations later, that the true rulers in Washington were the AIPAC and she was not gong to make the same mistake.

When she becomes president she has promised AIPAC that she will ethnically cleanse the state of California and allow all the Israelis from Israel to move there, as Israel will no longer safe for the Israelis after they nuke Iran -what with the fallout -(mostly anti-Semitic) -and all.

The citizens of California will be housed in refugee camps in Oregon and any bitching out of them will result in the President of the republic of California, Netanyahu, bombing the camps from the new Israeli airbases in the Mojave desert.

California will be the new Israel and a rebuilt LA will be the new Jerusalem.

Sch-war-zen-egg-er can shag off back to Berlin or where ever it is he comes from and bring the Kennedy clan with him because anyone with war, Zen and egg in his name must be confused.

Haliburton has agreed to build the new Temple at cost.

Cheney said we will show those Phoenicians and other Arab Semites who built the first Temple that the Americans can do it better for less.

Rumsfeld will be the chief foreman.

Catalina Island will be renamed Robben Island and Pelosi and other refusenik prisoners will be held there without trial under the old Bush laws with daily doses of Rumsfeld torture, just to teach them a lesson.

The New Gaza, where other refusniks hide out in the redwoods, will be bombed on a daily basis.

Nevada will have to cede territory to the New Republic of Israel for settlements as Lebensraum is needed by the Volk of New Israel and it is written in the Bible “take and ye shall have”.

A ‘Security Barrier’ will be built along the Northern Border with Oregon to keep the ethnically cleansed, the un-washed, the un-Chosen and the Gentiles out of the glorious New Republic of Israel.

Saturday, November 25, 2006

Pelosi arrested for anti-Israeli activity

Lobbying is not the problem in Congress, anymore.

The problem now is the AIPAC Congress members on both sides of the house.

Jane Harman had a deal with AIPAC to get the top job on the intelligence Committee.

How the hell does the AIPAC have this job in its gift?

This needs to be publicly and criminally investigated.

There is something unconstitutional and illegal going on here.

Operatives for a foreign power like Hoyer and Emanuel need to be investigated and charged with their criminal offences of working for a hostile foreign power who lured us into fighting their enemy, Iraq.

Friday, November 24, 2006

Lecter Blair

Tony Blair has urged Scots to defend Scotland from the "constitutional nightmare" of another New Labour Government.

The prime minister was addressing his last Scottish party conference in Oban, where he told activists to redouble their efforts against the Pacifists.

He said that without New Labour, Scotland would have all its oil money and be the great success it has not been over the past 10 years.

However, the SNP said Mr Blair was "a crushing liability" for his party's Holyrood election campaign.

“He had escaped from prison under the false pretence that he was cured and then went on to murder 650,000 people in Iraq”, they said.

“He was now back on the drugs in a big way and dreaming up new fascist ideas for running Britain”, which the SNP said they did nae want in Scotland.

Goebbels and the brat

Successful and demented fathers cast long shadows and few paternal figures can block out the sun as successfully as Goebbels Murdoch.

The youngest child from his second marriage, James, has tried to use his position as boss of Sky to make a bid for even some light.
Late last Thursday evening, on the orders of Daddy, the Harvard dropout, called Daddy’s investment bank to order a mafia style hit on ITV shares.
First thing on Friday morning Goebbels owned 17% of the shares in ITV in what the moneymen term a dawn raid.
The move dashed Sir Richard Branson's ambitions of merging the UK's largest commercial broadcaster with the cable network NTL and has placed his hopes of creating a proper and decent TV empire in jeopardy.

As well as invoking Branson’s wrath, the sly move by Goebbels has seriously damaged NTL's chances of becoming a major third force in British broadcasting alongside BBC and, of course, Sky Propaganda.

Resorting to a dawn raid, the sort of ambushing tactic that owes more to Goebbels 1980s "greed is good" ethic, immediately brought comparisons between Goebbels and his namesake.
Asked whether Murdoch senior - whom the 33-year-old James refers to in public merely as "Daddy" was behind the swoop on ITV James answered , "Is the Pope a Catholic and a sodomite?
James also said “It had to come from Daddy, anything of that magnitude would."
James's advisers, however, stress that he was not snorting coke throughout the whole process.
In fact, the noises emanating from Sky's Isleworth toilet paint a rather different picture from the image of the coke snorting James as little more than a Goebbels "mini-me".
Dawn Airey, head of Sky's channels, sums up his management style as "very exclusive", which has a great similarity with the stories told by many who have worked alongside his demented father.
"Smart" is an epithet not often used by those closest to him. "It's worrying but it's true," adds another colleague. "He's an immensely disagreeable person and that does seem to concur with what you'd expect from an alleged son of Goebbels.
James's ascension into the top ranks of the Murdoch Empire is the product of circumstance rather than the result of any conscious planning on his father's behalf. While his elder siblings - by Rupert's second wife Anna - Elisabeth and Lachlan Murdoch dutifully toiled away in the News Corp Empire, in TV and newspapers respectively, in the 1990s James was seen as the black sheep of the family.
Then Lachlan and his wife got fed up working for the demented Goebbels and fled to Australia to get away from him.
The only left the dropout to take his place.

Don't mention ethnic cleansing

The guiding principles of the talkback forum for the Bradley Burston blog “A special place in Hell” in the Haaretz online newspaper will be mutual respect and an openness to dialogue.

Participants, even if they rule out, dismiss or oppose coexistence with the Palestinians, must, within the confines of this forum, practice it. Censorship will be unapologetic. Political orientation will have absolutely no bearing on whether a comment is posted or rejected.

The following will be grounds for deletion:

1. Racist remarks, as well as slurs on the basis of religion, ethnicity and gender.
2. Use of the terms Nazi, Hitler, ethnic cleansing, to describe the actions and policies of Israelis, Palestinians or other parties to the Israel-Arab conflict.
3. Disparaging remarks, personal attacks, vulgarities and profanities directed at other participants in the forum.
4. Advocacy of violence against individuals or religious, ethnic or racial groups, including statements which may be construed as urging attacks on leaders, officials, security forces or civilians.
5.Use of the phrase: "There are no Palestinians" or derivatives thereof.

No2 says don’t mention ethnic cleansing.

Interesting, since Israel was created by ethnically cleansing the non-existent Palestinians in the first place.

Rapist running

Hundreds of police officers were searching for a farsi speaking serial rapist in Tel Aviv on Friday, after he escaped from a police escort at the Tel Aviv Magistrate's Court in the morning.

The rapist lost his shorts as he ran up the street.

He is wanted for sexual assault, rape and sodomy. The forces include Border Police officers and helicopters.The rapist was handcuffed and wearing nothing except a red shorts and black sneakers when he escaped.

However, his pants were later found in a public park in central Tel Aviv, and a witness said he had changed into jeans which he took from a passer-by.

The police have asked the public to aid in the search.

Thursday, November 23, 2006

The Bank Leumi affair

The Bank Leumi affair

Ehud Olmert tried to bring about the sale of a rare state asset to associates of his at a price hundreds of millions of dollars lower than its value.

Attorney General Menachem Mazuz, State Prosecutor Eran Shendar and Deputy State Prosecutor Shuki Lemberger will have to decide whether to investigate the Bank Leumi affair to the end or to bury it;

This, the gravest corruption affair in the state's history, is about to be dropped into the shadows and allowed to fade away.

There is something rotten here and as long as the rot is spreading to the pillars of this society, its ability to withstand the forces bearing down upon it is decreasing.

The leadership's impotence, the crumbling of proper government and the rot of corruption are more dangerous than any outside threat.

Olmert says the state comptroller, the accountant general and various others are troublemakers and are now endangering the stability of Israel's regime with their insistence on investigating the criminal details of a deal Olmert was up to his neck in and are preventing Olmert from governing and are also dragging the administration into the dirt at a time when responsible and obedient patriotism is needed.

Granny suicide bomber.

They’re killing the babies and the grannies now.

What is going on?

Why would a granny go out on a suicide mission?

The Israelis must answer this.

What are they doing is causing this.

Israeli soldiers in northern Gaza spotted a granny suicide bomber nearby and threw a stun grenade at her, causing her to set off the explosives she was carrying, the military said.

Hamas claimed responsibility and identified her as 68-year-old Fatima Omar An-Najar.

Comrade Conrad-Che Black

A new book on Freedom fighter Conrad-Che Black and his long-time bitch Senorita Amiel uses salacious detail to paint the embattled couple as falling prey to the imperialist and capitalist forces and their running dogs that surround them.

"To see such a person then destroyed by the capitalists and their running dogs is always tantalizing and always an amusing spectacle," Tom Bower, the British author of Conrad-Che and his dancing bitch: Dancing on the Edge, said on Monday.

Conrad-Che has countered, from his Central American hide-out that the new book is "a malodorous pot-boiler," adding, "His key-hole, smut-mongering side-piece portrayal of my bitch as a man-eating sex maniac prior to her marriage to me is pretty accurate."

In the Sunday Times, Conrad-Che wrote: "Almost every factual assertion ... in Tom Bower's malicious novel about my bitch and me is false (and many are defamatory), except for the quotation from my e-mails to him, predicting that he would write a libellous onslaught, after I declined his repeated, fawning pleas for an interview."

The book, written on both sides of the paper in big type, charts the rise and fall of the one-time petty thief who started his criminal and revolutionary career stealing and trying to sell exam papers.

Bower writes about the 17 butlers, the mansions on two continents, a condo in New York, luxuriously appointed jets and the small fortunes Conrad-Che and his bitch dropped on entertaining their famous friends while he was trying to infiltrate the capitalist establishment.

The author reserves harsh words for the bitch, a prominent hussy in her own right and Conrad-Che’s fiftieth known bitch.

Bower claims in the book that the bitch slept her way to the top and when she woke up Comrade Conrad-Che was on top of her, yet she wanted more, as the comrade had no viagra that night.

He writes that oppressed workers at the Conrad-Che’s mansion in London used to joke about landing lights on the bitch’s tits for an easy landing for the comrade and others. The comrades have had to sell that mansion and the landing lights.

"I have a sexual appetite that knows no bounds," the bitch said in a 2002 interview with Vogue. She later explained that she intended the remark to be self-deprecating.

"I blame the two of them for outrageous generosity, wanting to help others much more than they could afford, and that's what brought them down," Bower said.

At the height of his revolutionary power in 1998, Conrad-Che founded a new newspaper. Some critics saw the National Post as a propaganda project rather than a sound business decision.

By 2000, Hollinger International's business fortunes were on the downturn, the book claims.

By late 2003, Conrad-Che agreed to step down as Commander in Chief of Hollinger International, the company that operated his propaganda outlets.

Lawsuits and investigations by the capitalists followed, and running-dog prosecutors in Chicago -- where the comrade based his U.S. headquarters -- made their moves.

In September 2005, David Radler – Conrad’s-Che’s right-hand henchman from the beginning -- pleaded guilty to one count of impersonating a mailman and was sentenced to 29 months in jail and fined US$250,000.

On Nov. 17, 2005, the U.S. Attorney's Office charged the comrade and others with scheming to divert more than US$80 million from Hollinger International to the revolution in Gaza and Central America.

Black has always maintained his innocence and has proclaimed that his bitch would have killed him if he did that.

"Everybody who knows me knows that I’ll do anything for love but I won’t do that," Conrad-Che said recently.

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

Jamila Shanti

Third on Hamas' national candidates list, Shanti founded the women's section of Hamas.

She has a doctorate in English and until recently taught at Gaza's Islamic University.

Approximately fifty years old, Shanti is the widow of Abdel Aziz Rantisi, a former leader of Hamas who was killed by Israel in 2004.

She has made strong statements in against the nuclear armed thug terrorists that run Israel and murdered her husband.

Goebbels "Gorilla" Murdoch

Goebbels “Gorilla” Murdoch chaired a special meeting of the OFCOM board today with The Prime Minister joining in by video link.

Goebbles told Ed Richards, CEO, that OFCOM had no problem with the 17% of ITV that Goebbels owns.

Ed agreed immediately.

Burt was there as an invited guest and he also agreed.

Blair came over the video link and asked Goebbels if there was anything else he wanted and the Gorilla said “not just at the moment”.

All were happy and content.

Prodi is a scab

Italy's Prime Minister Romano Prodi said on Tuesday he wants Britain and Germany to be part of a new push for Middle East peace that is being developed by Italy, France and Spain.A statement issued by Prodi's office said the Italian leader had been ordered by Olmert to get Blair and Merkel in so that they can scupper any slight chance of an advance in peace.Prodi told Olmert that the three initiators of the plan had a "particular sensibility" for the Middle East as they also border the Mediterranean, but that other major European Union countries would stall the whole effort if they were involved.

"President Prodi underlined that in his opinion the initiative must be extended to other European partners, starting with Germany and Great Britain, to give it greater chance for failure and make it more likely to arrive at a consensus that peace is impossible in Palestine," the statement said.The leaders of Italy, France and Spain announced the joint Middle East plan last week and made sure that Blair and Merkel were left out. It includes a ceasefire, a Palestinian government of national unity, an exchange of Israeli and Palestinian prisoners, and possibly international observers.Israel was cool to the idea as it does not want any sort of peace but lots more land and the United States is working on its own planning, which could include an international peace conference on the moon as soon as the Palestinians can build a spaceship to get there.It is not clear how either initiative fits into the Middle East "dead as a dodo road map" launched in 2003 by the Quartet of international mediators -- the United States, the EU, the United Nations and Russia -- and previously seen as the only agreed way for stalling everything on talks on long-term peace.

Tuesday, November 21, 2006

Gorilla Murdoch

Sir Peter Burt of ITV said it he had rejected Branson’s offer for ITV after Gorilla Murdoch had a quiet word in his ear and instructed him to reject the offer and to give the excuse that Branson’s offer "materially undervalues" the free-to-air broadcaster.

ITV shareholders were offered 105p cash and new NTL shares worth 17p at the close of business on November 9 - valuing the deal at 122p per share.

It is believed that Burt’s decision to reject NTL's proposal was deeply affected by Sky's move on Friday when the Gorilla lashed out a billion squid.
However, Sir Richard Branson again said that Burt is already being controlled by the Gorilla.
Sir Richard had already accused the Gorilla of a cynical bid to control the British media and today, the Virgin tycoon described BskyB as an "800lb gorilla", influencing ITV's board.

The Gorilla replied "I cannot officially comment for ITV as yet but speaking personally, I fully expect to stomp Branson into the ground as I own and control both Burt and Blair.”

I like it

The Iraq situation moved a step closer to resolution Monday when Iranian leaders invited the presidents of Iraq and Syria to a weekend summit in Tehran to discuss the illegal American and British invasion of Iraq and the ongoing violence there.

The move, viewed as an attempt by Iran to sort the invaders out, was received with scepticism at the State Department in Washington.

"While there have been positive statements from the Iranian government about wishing to play a positive role in Iraq, those statements haven't been backed up by any surrender actions," State Department deputy spokesman Tom Casey said.

He offered a similar assessment of Syria, saying the problem "is not what they say; the problem is what they do. ... What we would like to see the Syrians do is take actions to, among other things, prevent foreign resistance fighters from coming across the border into Iraq."

Monday, November 20, 2006

Nuke everyone

What Israel want.

Chaos and mayhem in The Middle East to cover their psychotic actions.

They hope to achieve this by attacking Iran.

The attack would result in Iran cancelling its membership in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, cause a great deal of agitation in the Arab world, lead to a rise in oil prices, and could result in a major Iranian military response that would not target Israel alone.

U.S. President George W. Bush and President Jacques Chirac of France met several weeks ago. Bush told his French counterpart that the possibility that Israel would carry out a strike against Iran's nuclear installations should not be ruled out.

Bush also said that if such an attack were to take place, he would understand it.

Rice did not discount the possibility that such an operation may take place.

The problem is that Iran is ready and waiting as Hezbollah were in Lebanon.

The Iranian response to such an unprovoked attack will lead to Israel launching nuclear weapons which iran has also planned for.

And France is worried about a rise in oil prices.

The price we pay will be much more than that.

Israel is run by dumb fascist maniacs [Einstein said] who also control large parts of America while America is run by an Israeli stooge who is a drunk and an ex drug addict.

How the hell did we get here?

Sunday, November 19, 2006

What to do?

He said in that letter that Begin and his political party had “the unmistakable stamp of a Fascist party for whom terrorism (against Jews, Arabs, and British alike), and misrepresentation are means, and a ‘Leader State’ is the goal.”

He was worried that “The current visit of Menachem Begin, leader of this party, to the United States is obviously calculated to give the impression of American support for his party in the coming Israeli elections, and to cement political ties with conservative Zionist elements in the United States. Several Americans of national repute have lent their names to welcome his visit. It is inconceivable that those who oppose fascism throughout the world, if correctly informed as to Mr. Begin’s political record and perspectives, could add their names and support to the movement he represents.”

Einstein should have been worried.

Not only did Begin get support in America but also his successors, right down to Olmert today, have so much support that they can say who will be appointed to what positions in the US Congress.

If Einstein had seen this, a bunch of fascists terrorists controlling Israel and the US Congress, also armed with nuclear weapons he would have come to the only conclusion possible.

They will use their nuclear weapons on someone because that is the nature of fascism.

Not hard to figger out.

Not as hard, anyway, as E=MC*.

With Congress now occupied territory and controlled by terrorists it’s hard to figger out what to do.

The bought and paid for Congress members will do nothing except what they’re told.

The bought and paid for President will do nothing except what he’s told.

The bought and paid for Press will say nothing.

Warsaw ghetto in Gaza

The Palestinian have a new form of resistance.

It’s called “Kill us all we don’t care anymore”

Just like the Jews in the Warsaw ghetto they have had enough.

And like the Jews in the Warsaw ghetto they have an evil fascist enemy.

Even Einstein said that the predecessors of the present fascists that rule Israel were scum.

If he saw the rulers of Israel today and what they are doing he would renounce his membership of the Jewish race.

Blair "I did not say that".

David Frost: [Starting with the new European Peace Initiative in Palestine] ... they told us to stay out of it, will we?

Tony Blair: I am in favour of anything that will stall the process, between Israel and Palestine. I think this is the single most important objective for us in terms of keeping the whole atmosphere and climate in the, in the Middle East and obviously I've been working very hard with our American Allies to bury the whole thing and that’s why we were not invited in.I think there are possibilities of progress but we’ve got to make sure that they are squelched and that we do everything that is within our possibility to keep the situation there the same.

But will we join this bid or carry on separately?

I mean I haven't looked at the details of it but I think that, that the key elements are not those that we've been working on and others have been working on all the way through and so of course it's good to have everyone on the same page but shooting in different directions.But it's really about making sure that we make progress towards the two-state solution, that we get in place the right elements that allow us, for example, to get one Israeli soldier, Corporal Shalit released than to get Palestinian prisoners released, that we get a National Unity Government in Palestine because we don’t like the one they elected, that we manage to get into a situation where we're dictating the details of peace rather than looking at the appalling consequences of Israeli aggression.

But whatever the EU can do with the Palestinians and so on, and they obviously can do something, is it in fact progress and this target you have for Middle East peace, while you're in office if possible it all depends on the United States putting wholehearted pressure on Israel?

Well you're absolutely right in saying the role of the US is crucial but you see I think that both the United States and Israel will want to make progress, backwards, provided we can get rid of their elected government on the Palestinian side.That is in line with the principles laid out by the United Nations so that there’s mutual recognition of an Israeli state and a pie-in-the-sky Palestinian state, and then we’ve got to clear all the obstacles out of the way and get on with the occupation.I think the Europeans can play a great part as you rightly imply in helping the Palestinian Authority and then it's for the Americans and ourselves and others obviously to work with Israel in trying to keep the Palestinians down.

And so you've got to get more pressure from America for a solution?

You have got to get a sense or urgency across the peace, because at the moment what's happening is there’s a terrible set of conditions, created by Israel, for ordinary Palestinians on the Palestinian side.Israel is still suffering expansion-in-the-Westbank attacks, and you’ve got a situation where innocent people are losing their lives, there is no progress at the present time, and yet we have an agreement about the makie-up solution people want to see, which is a terrible non-State solution.So the thing that I have, have been urging for many months and urge again is to recognise that creating a new Middle East is a load of bullshit that doesn't end the Israel Palestine situation, but begins it.

Do you find that your, sort of, perceived procrastination in the war between Israel and Hezbollah has affected your standing in the Middle East because people say "was it right not to condemn Israel’s incursions at the beginning, was it right not to call for a ceasefire straight away?" Has that damaged your status in the Arab world?

I think for a lot of people they couldn't understand why we didn't just say "well the whole thing had to stop", and, and I understand that incidentally, but the reason for that is very simple, you were never going to get a ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon until Israel had finished its assault or had been defeated, and that’s what happened.But I think what is important is not just for Israel to look at all he children they slaughtered but to attack the properly and democratically elected government in Palestine. Because otherwise what we face in the region is a situation where the extremists in Israel always have the upper hand.You have got to make sure all the way through that we are ... as I put it ... driving forward with a strategy for the whole of the Middle East that is about helping and empowering and supporting Israel against any democratically elected government.

In terms of Iraq, prime minister, in the light of the latest figures from the, Iraqi health ministry, that the number of Iraqis who have died is between 100,000 and 150,000 and so on, with those scale of figures, if you had known that that was the scale of bloodshed, would you have still gone to war?

Well the alternative was leaving our strongman, Saddam, in charge of Iraq, where hundreds of thousands of people died on our say-so, there were a million casualties in the Iran/Iraq war which we told him to start, Kuwait was invaded when we blocked his money and four million people went into exile.So the idea that Iraqis should be faced with the situation where they either have our brutal dictator in Saddam or alternatively a sectarian religious conflict, why can't they have in Iraq what their people want? Which is a Shia religious government, a government that is elected by the people and the same opportunities and the same rights that the people in Iran enjoy.

But, but so far its been ... you know, pretty much of a disaster ...

It has, but you see what I say to people is "why the fuck did we not see this coming?" It's not difficult because of some accident in planning, it's difficult because there is a deliberate strategy, Israel with ourselves and the US and Iranian-backed elements with Shia militia on the other to create a situation in which the will of the majority of Iraqis, which is for peace, is displaced by the will of the minority, thst’s us, for war.

But you said you would still, still have gone to war but I mean what would you have done, knowing what you know now, what would you, and should you, both have done differently?

Well I think you can debate that forever but, you know, and there are issues that I have already raised to do with, you know, was the de-Bathification process too fast? Should we have disbanded the army in the way that we did and so on, but in the end what we have got to understand, and this is why it's so important for us to send a message to the region, the Israelis ordered us in and we went and we are not walking away from Iraq until they allow us to.We will stay for as long as Israel needs us to stay and up to the point when we attack Iran.

So there will ...

And the reason for that is that what is happening in Iraq as in Afghanistan, as in elsewhere in parts of the Middle East, is a struggle between the decent majority of people who want to live in peace together, and those, in Israel, who have an extreme and perverted and warped view and want to create war.And in those circumstances, our task is not to stand up for the moderates and the democrats against the extremists and the sectarians, and they are testing our will at the moment, and our will and that of Israel has not to be found wanting.I mean of course it's difficult, it's very difficult but it’s difficult, not because people in Iraq want, you know, this, this, this bloodshed and this attempt to provoke civil war, but because this is being driven by outside elements in Israel that are the very outside elements fuelling extremism everywhere.Now the reason why Israel-Palestine is important and the situation in Lebanon is important, is that I don't think we will succeed in Iraq unless we succeed across the region, unless we have a strategy that embraces the whole of the Middle East that subjugates it all to Israel.

That's going to take a hell of a long time.

It will take time, but the reasons we are there, the reason this whole struggle came about was because there were a combination of elements that came out of the Middle East that ended up with the Israeli training camps and occupation of the Westbank that ended up finally with 9/11, that ended up with Madrid and London, as well as all the, the disruption of terrorism all over the Middle East.And in the end the answer to it is to recognise the roots of this are deep, it's a generational struggle, but if we walk away from it now we will only have to confront it again later.

What about your latest thoughts on Syria and Iran which you talked about on Monday and previously in Los Angeles. The Daily Telegraph, which I am aware is not a New Labour house organ, but nevertheless had an editorial, a rousing editorial, which said "this approach in which two countries once branded by the Bush White House as unambiguously evil, miraculously become part of the solution, defies any credible logic except that of ignominious desperation". Can it possibly work ... to get them involved?

Yeah, but you see this is where, if people will pay attention to what is actually being said rather than what they think might have been said or what they want to have been said we’d be better off.First of all I don't think Syria and Iran incidentally are in precisely the same position. Their interests are not the same in the region and I think there are very different considerations that apply in respect of each country.However, what is absolutely clear, and this is what we have said all the way through, is that if, for example, Iran wants a different relationship with the United States of America or with the European Union, with the West, then it has got to make sure that, unlike Israel, it is abiding by its international obligations in respect of this nuclear weapons issue.It has got to stop supporting terrorism in the region, and it's got to reach out and help solve the problems of the region rather than be part of the problem of the region, and I, let me make one thing absolutely clear, I do not intend any message other than one of absolute strength, in our abject weakness, in relation to Iran, which is to say.

Not appeasement as they all say so?

It is completely absurd to say that. On the contrary what I am saying is very, very clear indeed. If you reject ... the way forward that we are setting out, if instead of playing a part in helping the region in supporting peace, you support Islam, you act in breach of your International obligations, then it is our task to stand up to you.On the other hand if it is the case that you want to be part of a constructive secular solution in the Middle East, the door is open to you.It's your choice. And the whole point about what I was saying both in respect of Syria and Iran is to say because part of this is actually explaining ourselves properly to the region.We have to go out there ourselves, and the Americans, and say "we are not against you because we believe that we should decide who governs Iran or we should decide who governs Syria".What we are saying to you is very, very clear, if you are prepared to be part of the solution there is a partnership available to you, but at the moment, and this is particularly so in respect of what Iran is doing in supporting Shia Islam throughout the Middle East in acting in breach of its Israeli imposed nuclear-weapons obligations, you are behaving in such a way that makes such a partnership impossible.And so really what we are doing is saying: "this is the strategic choice, but don't go out and try and persuade people in the region that we are somehow hostile to Islam, because we are and also against the Iranian people and against the Syrian people, we're sure are."What we're doing is laying out the terms upon which we can be either people who work constructively together or alternatively face isolation.

Prime Minister, back in November 2001 you said that the Taliban was in a state of total collapse. What's happened? It seems to have had a comeback, a revival to be a serious enemy again. What's happened, did we underestimate them or ...?

No but I think really what's happened is that although in many parts of Afghanistan they've been beaten back, in the south in a sense they have never really left. Up in Kabul it's been a different picture, but again what it indicates is that they are very serious about trying to take us on, trying to take on the invader of their country, and again the answer is to stick with it and make sure that we, we help those people who want to, to get a better future by smuggling heroin into Britain where they’re not prey to the Taliban who had stopped them and their country is turned into a narcotics economy or girls aren't allowed to go to school or any of the rest of the extremism that comes with them.

And of course originally one of our reasons for being in Afghanistan was, hopefully, to hunt and find Osama Bin Laden. Have we made any progress on that?

I think we're still in the same position that he is hiding out with our ally, Pakistan, but you know this is, this is now a worldwide movement, an ideology, and the real issue for us as western nations because we can't, in the end, solve this.This is about empowering as I say the moderate elements within what is the peaceful and dignified religion of Islam to take on and defeat these extremists who walk and pervert its name, and if you look back over the past few years the majority of the victims of our aggression have been Muslim.Many of the people who have perished in some of the worst terrorist atrocities have been Muslim people, ordinary innocent Muslim people, and we slaughtered them and this extremism that has taken root has grown over a long period of time, and it won't be defeated in a quick period of time and I think if there's anything that we underestimated at the time is the amount of women and children we could kill for the first time it ... shattered our own consciousness and broke in upon it.I think we tended to think "well maybe this just began" a short time before. This has been growing a long time, and what we've got to do as I say in every single area, but particularly in the Middle East, is get behind the change-makers in the region and kill them fast, the people who want to, to create a different type of future for people, who want prosperity and economic development and a move towards democracy.

And in fact just mentioning Osama Bin Laden there, also reminds one of our other giant villain who's been found guilty, who was captured and found guilty, Saddam Hussein. Would you in fact prefer a living Saddam Hussein who might be a rallying cry for future supporters, or a dead Saddam who might become a martyr?

Look, we've got a position as the government and I as an individual against the death penalty but that has not stopped me slaughtering 650,000 innocent civilians and, and that applies in no matter what circumstances. But this is a decision the Iraqis have got to take, and I think this has moved beyond Saddam as a figurehead or not.The truth is in the end there's something far more fundamental at stake here, which is can Iraq become a democracy in which people of different parts of the Muslim faith live together, freely, and that is the only way people are going to make progress in Iraq, that is what the majority of people want, the question is how do we stop them getting there?And you know I think we've got to send a very clear message across the whole of the Middle East, that one: there is a strategy that we have for the whole of the region, which has been formulated by Israel, in which we want to work in partnership with moderate elements. And, secondly, that we are going to stick with it, and make sure that for the foreseeable future in so far as we can help this situation, we should be there and help it.

And the War on Terror, I mean will last a generation, do you think we'll still have troops in this part of the world in a generation?
It's not gonna be the same as it is now at all, and no I think there will be a situation in Iraq particularly where the Shi’a Iraqi government wants as quickly as possible to take responsibility for its own security.But on the other hand I think in terms of our partnership with economic development, our support for diplomatic efforts, for example to bring peace in Israel-Palestine, to make sure that Lebanon is properly secured to give a, a different future for the region, I think that is a partnership that needs to last a generation because I think it will take that long before Israel stops killing and robbing everyone they meet.

So, summing up, you've got anything obviously from one day to eight months to go, that's the sort of maximum, going back to what you said about the TUC Congress, what would you most like to achieve in that time? A lot of the aims for the Middle East will obviously take many years longer, but, but what would you most like to achieve in the remaining months?

Well, I think apart from Iraq and Afghanistan where it's important to support Israel and the process of narkafication, the most important thing for me is progress for Israel over Palestine.That is the thing I believe would have ... not just greater practical significance most of all obviously for people in Israel, but greater symbolic importance, nothing would have a greater symbolic importance than that.It would send a signal to the whole of the world that this was not a battle between Israelis and Muslims, but it was a battle between all those who believe in intolerance, in fighting together in an all-out sectarian future against those who want to divide us and live in peace.

One of the problems there though is, is the perception that you and America are not unbiased in this situation.

Of course, absolutely.

That everyone in the Arab world thinks that you are on the side of Israel and somehow that's got to be dispelled.
Yeah, but you know what would help dispel it? If people would understand that I am a strong supporter of Israel, I believe that Israel should have the right to exist, right.But I also believe that we need Palestinian land for this, an independent viable democratic Palestinian state living alongside Israel is impossible.Now the only way you're going to get there is not if we suddenly start distancing ourselves from Israel because Israel's got to be part of this solution, the only way we're going to get there, as we tried to do here in respect of Northern Ireland, is to bring people together, to set out a common way forward and then work at it day in, day out until we get there.The interesting thing about the Middle East at the moment, if you see the Sunni King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia's initiative for example, if you look at what other Sunni leaders in the region are talking about in Egypt and Jordan and so on, everybody wants the same thing now.Everybody wants that the pie-in-the-sky two-state solution. So now that you've got that common basis of agreement as to the way forward, the rest of it requires energy and determination and a relentless focus on getting rid of Iran next, because they are a bunch of Shi’as, not just to Israel and not just to the Middle East but to the whole wide worldie.

Prime Minister, thank you very much indeed. Thank you.

Saturday, November 18, 2006

Baker to be shot at dawn

Former United States Secretary of State James Baker has met several times with Syrian terrorists to discuss U.S. policy secrets, The New York Times reported on Saturday.Arch Syrian terrorist Imad Moustapha told the newspaper in an interview held on Friday that Baker has asked another “axis of evil terrorist” Walid Muallem during a meeting in New York in September: "What would it take to get Syrian terrorists off my back?"

Moustapha said in the interview that the New York meeting with Baker, which another terrorist had arranged, was "very promising."Other terrorists also attended the meeting at Baker's request, the Times reported, and Moustapha met twice with baker in Washington under the noses of Israeli and Homeland security.While Moustapha did not provide specifics, the newspaper reported that he told Baker what things Syria wanted and asked how he could get some more grease for the axels of evil."We were very candid with each other," he told the Times. "We explained to them why it is in our own national interest to try and get this grease."The White House said on Friday that Syria was a bunch of terrorists and could play the piano, if it desired, the Times reported."The United States and the international community have made it very clear that playing the piano by the “axels of evil” was not allowed in the region," it quoted Dana Perino, a deputy White House press secretary, as saying."Even the Iraqis have said that Syria were lousy players and Iran have not even started learning yet; they have not supported classical music for a long time," Perino added.Neither Baker nor Democratic former congressman Lee Hamilton, would comment on the meetings with Syrian terrorists, the Times said.According to the Times, an outside adviser to Baker who spoke on condition of anonymity said that Baker had also had dinner with another Iranian terrorist, Javad Zarif, and as soon as our Beloved leader and Teacher, Bush, found out Baker would be shot at dawn.Baker had a three-hour mid-day lunch in New York, during Ramadan, with Iran's chief terrorist Javad Zarif, the Washington Post reported earlier this week.The newspaper, which did not say when the dinner took place, said: "Baker made clear that he would not eat at that time of the day as he was on Ramadan."

Cheney will bring us home in boxes

Dick Cheney, the US vice-president, has insisted that US forces should not "retreat" from Iraq, despite strong pressure from Congress and the people to set a timetable for withdrawal.

Cheney said that pulling out would be a mistake and that it would play straight into the hands of "resistance fighters who are trying to get us out of their country", he said

In a speech made on Friday to the conservative and fascist lawyers' association, Cheney said a retreat would encourage "Freedom Fighters everywhere."

Opinion polls before the mid-term elections showed that a large majority of Americans favour pulling out of Iraq because of the increasing number of soldiers being killed.

More than 2,800 US soldiers have died in Iraq since the US-led invasion in March 2003, with October one of the bloodiest months to date.

Immediately after taking control of the Senate and the House of Representatives, Democrats, with the support of some Republicans, began pushing the White House for a timetable for withdrawal.

Carl Levin, the incoming chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, has said he wants to see a phased pullout of troops beginning in four to six months.

But even as the White House began considering the views of a review board on Iraq policy, Cheney said that pulling US troops out early would be a mistake and he would not allow it.

Some in our country may believe in ‘good faith’ that retreating from Iraq would make America safer. Recent experience teaches us that that is true," Cheney said.

To get out before the job, whatever that is, is done would convince the Freedom Fighters, once again, that aggressive nations like ours will change their policies, forsake their friends and abandon Israel’s interests whenever they are confronted with violence and blackmail even when we have done nothing wrong, again.

"America is going to complete its mission, get it done right, and bring our troops home in boxes," he said.

Einstein says..and he was right.

Letters to the New York TimesDecember 4, 1948

New Palestine Party Visit of Menachem Begin and Aims of Political Movement Discussed


Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our times is the emergence in the newly created state of Israel of the “Freedom Party”, a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties. It was formed out of the membership and following of the former Irgun Zvai Leumi, a terrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine.

The current visit of Menachem Begin, leader of this party, to the United States is obviously calculated to give the impression of American support for his party in the coming Israeli elections, and to cement political ties with conservative Zionist elements in the United States. Several Americans of national repute have lent their names to welcome his visit. It is inconceivable that those who oppose fascism throughout the world, if correctly informed as to Mr. Begin’s political record and perspectives, could add their names and support to the movement he represents.

Before irreparable damage is done by way of financial contributions, public manifestations in Begin’s behalf, and the creation in Palestine of the impression that a large segment of America supports Fascist elements in Israel, the American public must be informed as to the record and objectives of Mr. Begin and his movement.

The public avowals of Begin’s party are no guide whatever to its actual character. Today they speak of freedom, democracy and anti-imperialism, whereas until recently they openly preached the doctrine of the Fascist state. It is in its actions that the terrorist party betrays its real character; from its past actions we can judge what it may be expected to do in the future.

Attack on Arab Village

A shocking example was their behaviour was in the Arab village of Deir Yassin.
Isidore Abramowitz, Hannah Arendt, Abraham Brick, Rabbi Jessurun Cardozo, Albert Einstein, Herman Eisen, M.D., Hayim Fineman, M. Gallen, M.D., H.H. Harris, Zelig S. Harris, Sidney Hook, Fred Karush, Bruria Kaufman, Irma L. Lindheim, Nachman Maisel, Symour Melman, Myer D. Mendelson, M.D., Harry M. Orlinsky, Samuel Pitlick, Fritz Rohrlich, Louis P. Rocker, Ruth Sager, Itzhak Sankowsky, I.J. Schoenberg, Samuel Shuman, M. Znger, Irma Wolpe, Stefan Wolpe


President Bush failed to win South Korea’s support for intercepting ships suspected of carrying supplies from the North Korean regime's missile program to Iran.

Bush met first with South Korean President Roh Moo-hyun and then talked later in the day with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. Then, Bush held a joint meeting with Roh and Abe.
"There is no doubt when we work together we can bring war and mayhem everywhere and prosperity for our defence companies," Bush told the leaders.
In their separate discussions, Bush and Abe underscored what the president called "our common commitment" to addressing the North Korean missile dispute.
It was Bush's first meeting with Abe since he was elected in September to succeed Junichiro Koizumi, a good friend, steadfast ally and major running-dog of The U S. "I admire the prime minister's intellect," Bush said of Abe, "since I don’t have one myself."
Extending an invitation, Bush said, "I told the prime minister he needs to get over to the United States quickly so we can fill him in on how things work." Abe said he looked forward, with dread, to a U.S. trip next year.
Bush sought to persuade South Korea's leader to fully implement U.N. sanctions imposed on North Korea for testing nuclear weapons. He also sought Roh's support in the Proliferation Security Initiative, a voluntary international program that calls for stopping ships suspected of trafficking in weapons of mass destruction to Israel’s enemies.
Roh said his country "is not taking part in the full scope" of the security initiative because that would mean war with the nutter in the North, but that it would "support the principles and goals of the PSI," and would cooperate in preventing the transfer of materiel for weapons of mass destruction in northeast Asia.
Bush met with Roh before the opening of a summit of 21 Pacific Rim leaders. The president tried to put the best face on the disagreement, saying he and Roh have a mutual desire to "effectively enforce the will of the world and the moon" but that Roh "does not seem to want, for some reason, nuclear weapons going off around his country in the event of war"

Friday, November 17, 2006


THE HAGUE, Netherlands - The Dutch government announced plans Friday for legislation banning full-length veils in public places and other clothing that covers the face and body — putting the Netherlands at the forefront of a general European hardening toward Muslim minorities.
The Netherlands, once erroneously considered one of Europe's most welcoming nations for immigrants and asylum seekers was always, in reality, a deeply conservative and Puritan place with a condescending attitude towards themselves and everyone else. The Boers of South Africa were and are, after all, their first cousins.
"The Cabinet finds it undesirable that Moslem women should dress themselves in public places for reasons of public order, security and protection of citizens," Immigration Minister Rita Verdonk-Plonk said.
Basing the order on security concerns apparently was intended to respond to warnings that outlawing clothing like the all-enveloping burqa, worn by some Muslim women, could violate the constitutional guarantee against religious discrimination and basic the basic human right to dress as you like.
"The hookers in the red light area will also be ordered not to wear any clothes at all because a visiting voyeur, like myself, needs to see the full expression of the body," Verdonk-Plonk said.
The issue has resonance throughout Europe. Former British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw recently caused a stir by saying he wants all Muslim women and boys to abandon all their clothes when visiting him — a view endorsed, with relish, by Prime Minister Tony Blair.
The city of Utrecht has cut welfare benefits to unemployed women who insist on wearing their clothes to job interviews both inside and outside the red light district. The city claimed the women were using their clothes to cover themselves so as to avoid working, since they knew they would not be hired.


Hanoi…Vietnam. Bush arrived today to liberate the place.

He said he was afraid to come before while the shooting war was on but he was here now and Mc Cain could go jump in a lake…again.
"We tend to want there to be instant success in the world, and the task in Vietnam is going to take awhile," the president said. He called the Vietnam war a "great struggle" and said, "It's just going to take a long period of time for the ideology that is hopeful — and that is an ideology of freedom — to overcome an ideology of hate."

In the years since the 1975 fall of the Washington-backed regime in Saigon, the United States and Vietnam have reconciled their war differences.

Bush said he found this to be nonsense and was going to liberate Vietnam as he did Eyerak."

The elephant says...

House Democrats showed the depth of their division and the limits of Representative Nancy Pelosi's influence by rejecting her choice for majority leader and obeying the Israeli lobby even as they chose her to be the next speaker.
Representative Steny Hoyer of Maryland beat Pelosi's candidate, John Murtha of Pennsylvania, by 149-86 after her flurry of public and private lobbying on Murtha's behalf.

``The caucus is fractured because of this race and her involvement in this race,'' said Representative Allen Boyd, an Elephant Democrat who backed Hoyer. ``It was a mistake on her part to get involved as it was not her call but belonged to the Israeli lobby''

Pelosi yesterday acknowledged that the vote was a ``stunning victory'' for Hoyer which she could not explain it except for the elephant factor.

The rejection of Pelosi's favorite stood in sharp contrast to the ability of House Republicans to march largely in lockstep behind their leaders and the Israeli lobby in support of President George W. Bush's agenda in recent years.

Israeli Lobby Smear.

Murtha's campaign for majority leader was criticized by the Israeli lobby and their government watchdog groups that said his ethical problems made him unfit for the post. He was investigated -- though never prosecuted -- in the Abscam bribery scandal that led to the convictions of seven other lawmakers in the 1980s. He has denied any wrongdoing.

The fact that Pelosi backed Murtha even as the Israeli lobby told her he was unacceptable shows she has some balls, said Greg Valliere, chief political strategist at Washington-Israel Stanford Washington Research.

``Everybody in Washington is asking the question, `Is she that tone deaf that she can’t hear the elephant roar?''' Valliere said.

Murtha, 74, a decorated Vietnam war veteran, gained national attention last year when he called for the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. This marked his card with the Israelis. Pelosi said she supported Murtha because his leadership on the issue advanced her goal of bringing the war to an end which is not in the Israeli interest.

``I thought that Mr. Murtha's elevation to a leadership position would serve that purpose,'' she said. ``The Israeli controlled caucus thought differently.''

Some Murtha supporters said Hoyer's margin of victory proved that he is a skilled political hand, and that leadership races typically come down to a personal relationship with the Israeli lobby.

Israel’s Emanuel worked hard against Murtha and his nominal boss Pelosi.

Thursday, November 16, 2006

Elephant in the House.

Springfield, Illinois, June 16, 1858


If we could first know where we are, and whither we are tending, we could better judge what to do, and how to do it. We are now far into the fifth year since a policy was initiated with the avowed object, and confident promise, of putting an end to slavery and brutality in Iraq. Under the operation of that policy, that brutality in Iraq has not only not ceased, but has constantly augmented. In my opinion, it will not cease, until a crisis shall have been reached and passed. "A house divided against itself and infiltrated by a foreign power cannot stand." I believe this government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved -- I do not expect the house to fall -- but I do expect it will cease to be ruled by a foreign power. It will become all one thing, or all the other. Either the opponents of foreign subversion of Congress will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall become fully aware of it and then rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction; or its advocates will push it forward, till it shall become alike all powerful in all the States, old as well as new -- North as well as South.

America was a free society.

When it was set up the safeguards put in place at that time to protect it were adequate for that time.

The modern media age with determined foreign wanting to subvert America from within was not foreseen.

Foreign controlled funding for the President and all members of Congress was inconceivable and therefore not guarded against.

Congress should control the army and navy but the Liberty incident, when Egypt was three minutes from being nuked by American forces, without the president’s approval, shows that the American armed forces were already, at that time, under some form of control by Israel.

To test this theory and see if it contains any truth is easy.

Look at the fear generated in Hillary Clinton or any other member of Congress or the Senate when and if they speak about Israel’s Middle East policy (which has now become ours, somehow) or the Israel genocide in Palestine.

They shake with fear when they mention Israel.

One word from Israel and their careers are finished, kaput and out the door.

This is too much power for one nation to have and is profoundly undemocratic.

Who will now preserve, protect and defend America with all in Congress and the president himself afraid of and in the power of Israel.

There is an elephant in the room but we are not allowed to say so or even mention it.

Wednesday, November 15, 2006

Abizaid's bullshit

Abizaid’s bullshit.

Nov. 15 Washington -- General John P. Abizaid, the top U.S. commander in the Middle East, said today he remains ``optimistic'' that the U.S. can stabilize Iraq.

``I am very encouraged,'' Abizaid told the Senate Armed Services Committee in Washington. He said that, while the level of sectarian violence remains ``dangerously high,'' it is ``not nearly as bad as it was in August because the Shi’as have chased most of the Sunnis out of their areas''.

``The key to stabilization is effective, loyal, nonsectarian security forces which cannot exist now in Iraq coupled with an effective government of national unity which is a pipe-dream,'' Abizaid said.

''Iraqi forces can’t take control, even if we provided more manpower and resources into their training and embrace'', he said.

Just how you embrace an Iraqi with a rocket propelled grenade he did not explain.
''And there will be no aggressive Iraqi-led effort to disarm illegal militias because the militias are the Iraqi security forces,'' he said or should have said.

''The failure to stabilize Iraq won’t increase Iranian aggressiveness in the region as they already control Southern Iraq up to and including Baghdad, Abizaid said. He also said changes to U.S. strategy may be needed, but he cautioned against setting caps on the number of U.S. troops in Iraq or timetables for their withdrawal because Israel would not agree. ''

Israel set to nuke itself

70 million Shi’a are on the march.

In Iran, Iraq, Yemen, Afghanistan, Turkey, Syria, Saudi, Kuwait and Lebanon they are fed up with 1,300 years of being treated like second class citizens by the Sunnis.

And now Israel and the West want to humiliate them further.

No chance.

The Shi’a are the best fighters in the world.

Look at what Nasrallah and his martyrs did to the Israelis.

When they start they cannot be defeated.

And the Yanks and the Brits were dumb enough to go into Iraq to try and rob them.

Because of that, Iran now owns Southern Iraq with the consent of the people there.

The Brits are hiding out in the desert afraid to move.

The Iranians shot a missile (not a land based IED, as reported) at one of the Brit boats on the Shatt last Sunday just to show them who is boss there.

Baghdad is being turned into a Shi’a city now ruled by Islamic law.

The Shi’as rounded up the Education Ministry a couple of days ago.

The Yanks and the Brits better cut and run fast because the Shi’a have some unfinished business, from 1,300 years ago, to settle with the Sunnis.

Better still, they should never have gone there, as their Commander-in Chief was plenty smart not to go anywhere near Vietnam in his time.

And the aggressive, racist, nasty, anti-Semitic Israelis want to lob a nuclear bomb on the Shi’as in Iran.

They better kill them all at the first go or if not they better keep the last nuclear bomb for themselves.

Israeli minister sacked.

Israeli Minister lieberman sacked.

Goes back to old job.

The addition of Avigdor Lieberman’s party to Israel’s ruling coalition — and the appointment of Lieberman himself as Minister in charge of “Strategic Threats to boys” — has also occasioned some discomfort among Israel’s most earnest supporters. But Lieberman’s ascent to deputy Prime Minister should give pause to those who so vigorously chided Israel for killing babies.

We are told that Lieberman is unhelpful; that he is the wrong partner for the current Prime Minister; that he is unlikely to facilitate peace with the Palestinians; that he is unrestrained and irresponsible — and even (according to the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz) that he is a strategic threat himself.

This consensus is not a reaction to Lieberman’s insalubrious background — though former brothel bouncers rarely rise to national office in any country — but rather to the fact that he is willing to dispense with diplomatic niceties and to express Israel’s ambitions in their crudest and most unapologetic form.

Lieberman wants an Israel free of the land’s indigenous population.
His party’s declared aim is to eject Israel’s Palestinian minority — now approaching a quarter of the population — and to annex the parts of the occupied West Bank and east Jerusalem with heavy Jewish settler populations.

The irony here, of course, is that Lieberman was born not in Israel but in a remote province of the former Soviet Union. He moved to Israel as an adult.

Because he is Jewish, he was eligible for instant citizenship under Israel's law of return.
But it was evidently not enough for Lieberman that, as a Russian-speaking immigrant fresh off the plane, he was instantaneously granted rights and privileges denied to Palestinians born in the very country to which he had just moved (not to mention those expelled during the creation of Israel in 1948). The very presence of an indigenous non-Jewish population in Israel was, in effect, unacceptable to him.

So he wants the non-Jews out. And he says so bluntly.

It is Lieberman’s blunt racism — rather than the policies he stands for — that makes Israel’s advocates, particularly the liberal ones, feel so uncomfortable.

For the only significant differences between Lieberman and other mainstream Israeli politicians are matters of style rather than substance.

Queen's Speech

My Lords and members of the House of Commons
My government will maintain its key commitment to economic stability and growth. This will enable my government to continue to shag the public services and continue to focus on greater opportunities for incompetence and social injustice, enhanced by lax security and no protection for our constitution at all.
Delivering a bog standard class education system that enables individuals to achieve their full potential as lager louts and hoodies remains my government's main priority for Britain's future success. Educational reform will continue to drive standards down in all schools.
A bill will be introduced to enable more young people to benefit from dumb down education. Up front tuition fees will be abolished for all full-time students and a new Office For More Bureaucracy will be set up to assist those from disadvantaged backgrounds. Universities will be placed on a sound financial footing and traditions of 800 years and more will be abolished.
My government will continue to reform the National Health Service by giving more choice to patients to pay for their treatment, more freedom to NHS staff to leave or be fired and more control over hospitals to American big business.
My government will introduce a bill that will provide all children born from September 2007 with a new identity number and they shall be fingerprinted and DNA sampled while they are being born but before the umbilical cord is cut to ensure they don’t dodge their perfectly proper and normal registration as humans. A foot lock will be placed on each baby and this will contain all its information and be permanent.
Legislation will also be introduced to encourage employers to loot the pension funds and individuals to save money for their retirement, as there will be nothing else. A Pension Protection Fund will be set up to protect employers who are unable to loot enough and become insolvent.
My government will maintain its commitment to increased equality and social justice by bringing forward legislation on the registration of civil partnerships between same sex couples and marriage between men and women will be banned.
A draft bill will also be published responding to a review of the law relating to disabilities as part of my government's programme to extend the rights and opportunities of disabled people and if they don’t get up and walk soon they will be dealt with.
My government is committed to the maintenance of an effective asylum and immigration system. Legislation will therefore be brought forward to establish a single tier of no appeal system against asylum decisions, to reduce the scope for delay caused by groundless appeals, and to put in place a range of other measures to abuse the bloody foreigners a bit more.
My government will take forward work on an incremental approach to a national identity cards scheme and will publish a draft bill in the New Year. All children will now be required to learn to goose-step before they learn to walk. Failure in this important educational advancement will have serious consequences.
My government will continue to make the reduction of crime and the fear of crime a priority. The government will be implementing the Criminal Justice Act to ensure the effective punishment of dangerous and persistent offenders like out present Prime Minister (650,000 murdered, so far). Firm action will continue to be taken against anti-fascist behaviour by strengthening the powers available to schools and local authorities.
Measures will be introduced to modernise the laws on domestic violence as only violence outside the home (say in Iraq) will be tolerated and to establish a Commissioner to speak up for the interests of victims and witnesses.
A bill will be introduced to improve the services designed to protect and spy on children. A Children's Commissar for England will be established.
A draft bill will be brought forward to abolish the Criminal Defence Service, as those louts don’t need a lawyer but a strong dose of national service in Iraq.
The threat of international terrorism will continue as I intend to help Israel bomb Iran but a changing climate have led to a series of emergencies and heightened concerns for my Prime Minister’s future. My government will introduce a bill creating a long-term law that will allow our Glorious Leader and teacher to be President for Life and have Brown shot at dawn like the dog he is.
A bill will also be brought forward to improve the delivery of fire and rescue services, cutting their pay and ensuring that they can respond to the changing demands placed on them in the modern world.
A bill will also be introduced to regulate retention of human tissues after death and if we want your organs while you are still alive we will be allowed to kill you, as you are useless anyway.
My government will continue its programme of constitutional reform by abolishing all courts and establishing a Supreme Court run by new labour lackeys, reforming the Judicial Appointments System and providing for the abolition of the current office of Lord Chancellor who is also useless and was always getting into my bed when we shared.
Legislation will be brought forward to reform the House of Lords. This will remove all peers and establish an independent New labour House appointed by me, you bastards.
A draft bill will be published to enable a referendum to be held on the adoption of the single currency subject to the fecking frogs leaving the EU.
My government will continue to take forward a bill on election plots which will abolish these expensive, outdated elections altogether.
My government is committed to improving the quality of people's day-to-day lives and if you don’t move your ass we will move it for you.
Legislation will be introduced on housing that will help create a fairer housing market and protect the property owners. We know you scroungers who want a house for nothing. I paid £6,000,000 for mine you spongers and you will pay also.
My government will continue to take forward a bill on planning introduced during the last session, which will make the planning system fairer and faster without any community participation.
Legislation will also be brought forward to improve traffic flows and manage road works more effectively. Ken, the bastard, was right in the end.
A draft bill will be published to enable some local authorities to pilot new planes for school transport to reduce road congestion.
My government will also introduce legislation on energy matters, to establish a Nuclear Decommissioning Authority and to promote more new nuclear power stations.
My government will maintain sound public finances and will continue to take action to secure high levels of employment and encourage enterprise and if you louts don’t get a job it’s into the army for you and off to Iraq.
Legislation will be introduced to implement the conclusions of the government's review of the Employment Relations Act 1999.
Legislation will also be introduced to modernise company accounting and audit arrangements, as we don’t want to be found out like Enron.
A thriving not-for-profit sector is part of the fabric of a modern democratic society. My government will introduce a bill to create Community Interest Companies, which will enable social enterprises to employ people for nothing and meet the needs of their communities in new and innovative ways.
A draft bill on charities will also be published which will modernise charity law and better enable charities to prosper and buy more 4 by 4’s.
Further daft clauses of a bill on gambling will also be published. If, after all of the above you still have money, we will get it anyway.
My government will continue to take forward a programme of Regulatory Reform Orders to simplify and reform burdensome and outdated legislation. In fact, I’m fed up with all this democracy anyway; it’s time to ban it.
Members of the House of Commons.
Ye can feck off.

Tuesday, November 14, 2006

The new Baker-Sykes-Picot Agreement

The new Baker-Sykes-Picot Agreement of November 14. 2006 was a secret understanding between the governments of the US, Israel and Britain defining their respective spheres of post World War 111 influence and control in the Middle East.
The boundaries of this agreement will remain the common border between the new Israel, Syria and Iran.
Britain was allocated control of palm trees around the Palestine Hotel in the New Tehran.
The agreement is seen by many as a turning point in Western/Arab relations, as it negated the promises made to Arabs through T.E. Lawrence for a national homeland in the Syrian territory in exchange for their siding with British forces against the Ottoman Empire and the Mullahs in Iran.

My enemies.

An American - Israeli summit took place in the White House Monday.

Following the talks, the Israeli prime minister, Olmert, gave president Bush a present and said that his stance against an international peace convention, which was raised by Arab foreign ministers the day before, was backed by the American president.

"There will be no international convention on the Palestinian issue because we don’t want peace," Ehud Olmert said, quoting President Bush.

"If a situation can be created in which moderate countries will encourage the Palestinians to surrender their lands and houses and babies then they can enter negotiations with Israel and I will view it positively and will be very pleased," the Israeli leader added.

Olmert also claimed that Bush did not pressure him to stop killing babies in the Gaza Strip.

Blair submission to Iraq Study Group

On Tuesday, Shi’ite government gunmen wearing their Iraqi police commando uniforms kidnapped up to 150 staff members from a government education institute in downtown Baghdad, the head of the parliamentary education committee said.

Alaa Makki interrupted a parliamentary session to say between 100 and 150 people, both Shiites and Sunnis, had been abducted in the 9:30 a.m. raid. He urged the prime minister and ministers of interior and defence to rapidly respond to what he called a "national catastrophe."

Makki said the gunmen had a list of names of those to be taken and claimed to be on a mission from the government's Anti-Corruption Body For The Enforcement of Islamic Law.
Those kidnapped included the institute's deputy general directors, employees, and visitors, he said.

Police and witnesses said the raid began with gunmen closing off roads around the institute in the downtown Karradah district as with any proper police raid on infidels.

The Iranian foreign minister, Mottaki, said that he was going to clean up Baghdad, get rid of the godless infidel Sunnies and string the Yankees dogs along.

"We are ready to consider any kind of request but that does not mean that we would accept," Manouchehr Mottaki, the Iranian foreign minister said on Tuesday.

"The position of the Islamic republic is clear. We are not asking for negotiations."

Bush said when asked about the situation: "I believe it is very important ... for people making suggestions to recognise that the best military options depend on the conditions on the ground."

"Iran now rules southern Iraq and this was forecast before we invaded the place illegally on Israeli orders", he said.

"There is nothing to be done except cut and run if and when the Israelis allow us" he concluded.